Gus Cancro's Discussions (11)

View

Discussions Replied To (11)	Replies	Latest Activity
"#5 still alive!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 18, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 #5 #5 #5" Gus Cancro replied Sep 17, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 #5 #5 needs to win!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 16, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"I vote #5!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 15, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 Michelle!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 14, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"I vote for #5 Michelle!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 13, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 still alive!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 10, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 needs to win!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 9, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 all the way!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 8, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"I vote #5; she needs a sweet backyard nest for her Airstream!" Gus Cancro replied Sep 4, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski