Vasilius's Discussions (13)

View

Discussions Replied To (13)	Replies	Latest Activity
"#5 - last vote I guess." Vasilius replied Sep 18, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 is still there..." Vasilius replied Sep 17, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 is the vote this morning." Vasilius replied Sep 16, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"Good morning. Voting for #5." Vasilius replied Sep 15, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 has another vote" Vasilius replied Sep 14, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"A vote for #5 is right here." Vasilius replied Sep 13, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 has my vote." Vasilius replied Sep 12, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 voting, right here, right now." Vasilius replied Sep 11, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5, thank you" Vasilius replied Sep 10, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5" Vasilius replied Sep 9, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski