Wade Cooper's Discussions (10)

View

Discussions Replied To (10)	Replies	Latest Activity
"I vote for #5!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 18, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"I vote #5!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 17, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 Michelle!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 16, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 Michelle!!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 15, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 Michelle" Wade Cooper replied Sep 14, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 gets my vote!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 13, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 it is!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 12, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"#5 -- the airstream needs some TLC!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 11, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"I vote for #5 -- the airstream needs some help!" Wade Cooper replied Sep 10, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski
"I vote for #5" Wade Cooper replied Sep 8, 2009 to VOTING IS CLOSED... PLEASE DO NOT VOTE. OFFICIAL VOTING PAGE FOR THE $16,000 BACKYARD MAKEOVER!!	4524	Sep 27, 2009 Reply by Shirley Garnkeski